OFAC Penalty Calculator
Estimate your OFAC violation penalty exposure using our penalty matrix. Civil penalties reach up to $377,700 per transaction — but voluntary self-disclosure, cooperation, and experienced legal counsel can dramatically reduce what you pay.
Message a sanctions lawyer on WhatsApp — confidential, reply within 24 hours.
Quick Answer: OFAC does not publish an automated penalty calculator. Its Enforcement Guidelines (31 C.F.R. Part 501, Appendix A) set out how a base penalty is determined: first, whether the case is egregious or non-egregious, and second, whether the subject person made a voluntary self-disclosure (VSD). Under IEEPA the statutory maximum civil penalty is the greater of $377,700 per violation or twice the value of the underlying transaction (inflation-adjusted figure, 90 Fed. Reg. 3687). The base penalty is then adjusted under eleven General Factors, and the size of each adjustment is not fixed by formula. This guide explains the framework and its limits so you can understand your exposure before engaging with OFAC.
OFAC Penalty Calculation: The Basic Framework
OFAC’s civil penalty framework flows from its Economic Sanctions Enforcement Guidelines (31 C.F.R. Part 501, Appendix A). The process has three stages:
- Statutory maximum. The ceiling is set by the enabling statute for each programme (IEEPA, TWEA, the Kingpin Act and others), per violation. Under IEEPA it is the greater of $377,700 or twice the value of the transaction; the figure is adjusted periodically for inflation, so confirm the current amount before relying on it.
- Base penalty. The base penalty depends on whether the case is egregious and whether a VSD was made (matrix below). In non-egregious cases it is tied to the transaction value; in egregious cases it starts from the statutory maximum.
- Adjustment under the General Factors. OFAC then weighs the General Factors in Section III of the Guidelines. They can move the figure up or down; the Guidelines state no fixed percentages.
Exposure is counted per violation. OFAC determines the number of apparent violations case by case; a business relationship involving many payments, shipments or documents can therefore produce a large aggregate base penalty before any mitigation is applied. Understanding how OFAC penalties work in practice requires looking at all three stages.
OFAC Base Penalty Matrix
The matrix is built on two questions: (1) is the case egregious? (2) did the subject person make a voluntary self-disclosure? Under the Guidelines:
| Case type | Base penalty amount |
|---|---|
| Non-egregious, VSD | One-half of the transaction value, capped at $188,850 per violation |
| Non-egregious, no VSD | The “applicable schedule amount” for the transaction value, capped at $377,700 per violation |
| Egregious, VSD | One-half of the applicable statutory maximum |
| Egregious, no VSD | The applicable statutory maximum |
In non-egregious cases without a VSD the applicable schedule amount rises with the transaction value:
| Transaction value | Applicable schedule amount |
|---|---|
| Less than $1,000 | $1,000 |
| $1,000 to under $10,000 | $10,000 |
| $10,000 to under $25,000 | $25,000 |
| $25,000 to under $50,000 | $50,000 |
| $50,000 to under $100,000 | $100,000 |
| $100,000 to under $200,000 | $200,000 |
| $200,000 or more | The statutory maximum per violation |
Whether a case is egregious is decided by analysing the General Factors, with substantial weight given to willful or reckless conduct, awareness of the conduct, harm to sanctions programme objectives and the individual characteristics of the subject person.
Statutory Maximums and Criminal Exposure
The figures below are the ones this guide can tie to a published source. Maximums for other statutes, such as the Trading with the Enemy Act, the Kingpin Act and sector-specific laws, differ and are adjusted each year; check OFAC’s current penalty table before relying on any number.
| Item | Rule | Source |
|---|---|---|
| IEEPA civil penalty | Greater of $377,700 per violation or twice the value of the underlying transaction (inflation-adjusted) | 90 Fed. Reg. 3687 |
| IEEPA criminal penalty (willful violations) | Fine of up to $1,000,000 and, for individuals, up to 20 years’ imprisonment, or both | 50 U.S.C. § 1705 |
| Limitation period (civil and criminal) | Ten years from the latest date of the violation (extended from five years in April 2024) | 50 U.S.C. § 1705 |
Willful violations can be referred to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution in addition to OFAC civil enforcement. OFAC may also resolve a case with a Cautionary Letter, a Finding of Violation, a civil penalty or a referral.
The General Factors OFAC Weighs
After the base penalty is set, OFAC weighs the eleven General Factors listed in Section III of the Guidelines:
- Willful or reckless violation of law
- Awareness of the conduct at issue
- Harm to sanctions programme objectives
- Individual characteristics
- Compliance programme
- Remedial response
- Cooperation with OFAC
- Timing of the apparent violation in relation to the imposition of sanctions
- Other enforcement action
- Future compliance and deterrence effect
- Other relevant factors on a case-by-case basis
The Guidelines do not assign percentage increases or reductions to individual factors. The size of any adjustment is decided case by case, so no calculator can give a reliable settlement figure. Treat any estimate as a range for discussion with counsel, not a prediction.
Voluntary Self-Disclosure: What It Does
Understanding how voluntary self-disclosure works can make a decisive difference. The Guidelines define a VSD as a self-initiated notification to OFAC of an apparent violation, made before or at the same time that OFAC or another government agency discovers the violation or a substantially similar one, and followed by a report of sufficient detail to give a complete understanding of the circumstances.
- Timing: the disclosure must come before the authorities discover the violation. A notification made after OFAC already knows, or one required of a third party after a transaction was blocked or rejected, does not qualify.
- Content: the submission should identify the programme concerned, describe the circumstances and be accurate and complete; false or misleading information defeats VSD treatment.
- Effect: as the matrix shows, a VSD roughly halves the base penalty, and it is also considered under the General Factors on cooperation and remedial response.
VSD is not always the right strategy. If OFAC already has knowledge of the conduct, if the violation is not clearly established, or if disclosure would create criminal exposure, counsel should weigh the options before anything is filed.
Where to Find Real OFAC Penalty Examples
OFAC publishes every enforcement action, with the number of apparent violations, the base penalty, the aggravating and mitigating factors and the final amount, on its civil penalties and enforcement information page. Outcomes range from Cautionary Letters with no penalty to multi-million-dollar resolutions. Reading the releases for your sector and sanctions programme is the most accurate way to benchmark exposure; this page does not reproduce settlement figures that cannot be traced to a specific release.
How an OFAC Lawyer Can Minimize Your Penalty
The OFAC penalty calculation methodology creates significant room for advocacy at every stage. An experienced OFAC lawyer intervenes in the following ways:
- Pre-disclosure investigation: Before any communication with OFAC, counsel conducts a privileged internal investigation to identify all violations, assess their severity, and determine whether VSD is strategically advisable.
- Egregious classification defense: Whether a violation is classified as egregious often turns on contested facts about knowledge, intent, and management involvement. Legal counsel builds the factual record that supports non-egregious treatment — which can substantially lower the base penalty.
- VSD preparation and submission: A well-crafted VSD submission is not simply a recitation of facts. It frames the narrative, presents mitigating context, and begins the mitigation argument before OFAC investigators form their initial views.
- Violation count minimization: OFAC counts transactions as violations, but what constitutes a “transaction” is not always obvious. Counsel can argue for transaction aggregation (treating multiple related payments as one violation) to reduce the total violation count.
- Mitigation presentation: Comprehensive mitigation submissions document compliance program strength, remediation steps, and cooperation in the most favorable light — presenting a systematic argument for the maximum downward adjustment on each factor.
- Settlement negotiation: OFAC retains discretion to accept settlements below the calculated matrix penalty. Counsel experienced in OFAC enforcement can assess the realistic range and negotiate effectively.
If you have discovered a potential OFAC violation — or received an OFAC subpoena or administrative inquiry — time is critical. The window for voluntary self-disclosure closes the moment OFAC independently learns of the violation. Contact our OFAC lawyers today for a confidential assessment of your exposure and options.
Understanding your potential penalty exposure is the first step — preventing violations is the second. Review our OFAC compliance programme template and step-by-step OFAC compliance checklist to build or audit your compliance framework proactively. If you have already received an OFAC inquiry or discovered a potential violation, contact our OFAC lawyers immediately for a confidential assessment of your exposure.
Related OFAC Services
See also: OFAC Compliance Checklist | OFAC Compliance Program Template | OFAC Enforcement Defense
Message a sanctions lawyer on WhatsApp — confidential, reply within 24 hours.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much is an OFAC penalty?
Under IEEPA the civil penalty is capped at the greater of $377,700 per violation or twice the value of the underlying transaction (inflation-adjusted). A willful violation can also be punished criminally by a fine of up to $1,000,000 and, for individuals, up to 20 years’ imprisonment (50 U.S.C. § 1705(c)). The actual civil penalty starts from a base amount set by OFAC’s Enforcement Guidelines, which depends on whether the case is egregious and whether you voluntarily self-disclosed, and is then adjusted under the General Factors.
How much does voluntary self-disclosure reduce an OFAC penalty?
Under the base penalty matrix in OFAC’s Enforcement Guidelines (31 C.F.R. Part 501, Appendix A), a voluntary self-disclosure roughly halves the base penalty: in a non-egregious case it is one-half of the transaction value (capped at $188,850 per violation) instead of the schedule amount, and in an egregious case one-half of the statutory maximum. A VSD is also considered under the General Factors (cooperation and remedial response), but the Guidelines do not fix percentages, so no overall reduction can be promised.
What makes an OFAC violation egregious?
OFAC decides this by analysing the General Factors, giving substantial weight to willful or reckless conduct, awareness of the conduct, harm to sanctions programme objectives and the individual characteristics of the subject person. In an egregious case the base penalty starts from the statutory maximum (one-half of it with a VSD); in a non-egregious case it is tied to the value of the transaction.
Can OFAC penalties be negotiated?
Many OFAC enforcement cases are resolved by settlement. OFAC takes cooperation, remedial response and the compliance programme into account under the General Factors, so a settlement can be well below the statutory maximum, but the outcome depends on the facts and nothing is guaranteed.
Is there a statute of limitations on OFAC penalties?
Yes. Since the 21st Century Peace through Strength Act (24 April 2024), civil enforcement and criminal prosecution for IEEPA and TWEA violations must be commenced within ten years after the latest date of the violation (50 U.S.C. § 1705(d)); the limit was previously five years. OFAC applies the ten-year period to violations that were not already time-barred when the Act took effect. Prompt legal advice is essential when a potential violation is discovered.